The Anatomical Conditions of the Alveolar Process of the Anterior Maxilla in Terms of Immediate Implantation-Radiological Retrospective Case Series Study.

The feasibility and the level of difficulty of immediate flapless implantation depend largely on the residual alveolar bone. The purpose of the study was to determine how often immediate flapless implantation in the anterior maxilla is feasible and assess the difficulty level using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. A radiological retrospective case series study was conducted. In total, 1200 CBCT scans from 300 consecutive patients were analyzed with dedicated planning software. Immediate flapless implants were possible in 78.33% of cases. Drilling direction was either through the apex or the palatal slope. Bimodal was conducted in 9% of the cases; only through the apex in 13.08% of the cases and in 56.25% only in the slope. In 21.67%, immediate flapless implants were excluded. The feasibility and degree of difficulty differed statistically to the disadvantage of the lateral incisors compared to the central incisors. Drilling direction caused that BASE classification reflects the difficulty level of immediate implantation. CBCT is a helpful diagnostic tool for assessing the feasibility of immediate flapless implants due to the residual bone shape and volume. BASE classification helps to determine a challenge level that may also facilitate communication and result in comparison. The alveolar bone condition allows for immediate flapless implants in most cases in the aesthetic region of the maxilla, but they should be performed by an experienced specialist with regard to the bone and soft tissue quality.

New Approach to Treatment of High-Risk Allograft Recipients Under Chronic Immunosuppression With Tooth Loss. Evaluation of Safety and Longevity of Dental Implants: A Case Report.

Patients eligible for solid organ transplant often lose their teeth and show numerous caries as well as periodontal and mucous membrane pathologies. The conventional methods of restoring teeth, including bridges and removable dentures, may result in progress of periodontal disease or even the creation of local source of general infection. Dental implants are not recognized as a therapeutic method in solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppression because of the possibility of implant osseointegration disorders and suspicion as to the possibility of dysfunction of the transplanted organ and the spread of systemic infection. The authors present a case of the patient after liver transplant receiving immunosuppression treatment, who benefits from dental implants because of tooth loss. Three dental implants introduced because of the conventional loading protocol were healed and have osseointegrated without complication. Dental crown supported on them have restored the dental arches of the patient with good esthetic and functional effect. The results of treatment were stable in the 2-year follow-up period. No local signs of infection or general health disturbance were found. The function of the transplanted liver was unaffected.

Differences in the Incidence of Pathologic Lesions on the Oral Mucosa in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis vs Renal Organ Transplant Recipients Subjected to Long-term Pharmacologic Immunosuppressive Therapy.

Disorders of homeostasis and an increased incidence of infection in patients undergoing hemodialysis causes frequent appearance of pathologic changes in the oral mucosa. The organ transplant and subsequent pharmacologic immunosuppression may result in systemic disorders manifesting by pathologic oral lesions. METHODS: The study was conducted on 18 patients undergoing hemodialysis and 18 patients after renal transplant. The study comprised case taking and physical examination, including detailed intraoral and extraoral examination. RESULTS: The intraoral examination revealed gingivitis in 61.1% of patients in both groups. In the renal transplant group compared with the hemodialysis group 55.6% vs 38.9% of patients had gingival recession, 55.6% vs 44.4% had periodontitis, 27.8% vs 22.2% had macroglossia, and 11.1% vs 5.6% had geographic tongue, respectively. In the patients on hemodialysis leukoplakia and pallor or pathologic pigmentation of oral mucosa were more frequently observed lesions. Other significant findings in the renal transplant group were lingual papillary atrophy, aphthae, and erythroplakia. Patients of both group reported xerostomia, halitosis, gum bleeding, dysgeusia in their history. DISCUSSION: Both groups of patients after renal transplant and patients undergoing hemodialysis presented pathologic lesions in the oral cavity. The study revealed the differences between type and frequency of these pathologic changes, which shows different effect of the above methods of treatment of end-stage renal failure on the oral cavity.